Monthly masterminds, weekly updates, and networking with coliving operators worldwide.
Choosing and implementing the coliving software stack, from PMS to smart access and resident apps.
Mayank Pokharna · Founder, Everything Coliving
13 years in coliving · Reviewed by the Everything Coliving team
Technology work is about choosing and implementing the software stack that runs a coliving business well: the property management system, smart access, and the resident facing apps that tie it together. The stack should reduce work, not add screens.
The trap is buying tools before you understand the workflows they are meant to serve, then bending your operation around software that was never built for coliving. The right sequence is process first, then tools.
The goal is a connected, sensibly sized stack where data flows between systems, staff spend less time on manual admin, and residents can do the obvious things themselves without waiting for someone at a desk.
It covers the core coliving stack: the property management system that holds tenancies, billing, and occupancy, the access control that lets residents into the building and their rooms, and the resident app that handles enquiries, payments, bookings, and communication.
It also covers the connections between them, which is where most of the value and most of the pain live. A PMS that does not talk to your access system or your accounting means someone is re keying data, and every manual handoff is a place for errors and wasted time.
Finally it covers the fit question: coliving has needs that generic residential or hotel software often handles badly, such as short flexible stays, shared spaces, and community features. Choosing tools built for or adaptable to that reality matters more than a long feature list.
We start from your workflows, not from vendor demos. What does a move in actually require, how does billing work, how do residents raise issues, and where does staff time currently disappear? The stack should be chosen to serve those flows, so we map them before we look at any product.
Then we shortlist tools against your real requirements and budget, and pressure test the integrations rather than trusting a feature checkbox. The question is not whether two systems can connect in theory but whether they will carry the specific data you need without manual patching.
Implementation is staged so the operation keeps running. We sequence the rollout, plan the data migration carefully, and train staff, because the best tool badly implemented is worse than a modest tool that everyone actually uses.
A good stack is quiet. Data entered once flows everywhere it is needed, staff stop re keying between systems, and the obvious resident tasks (paying rent, booking a room, reporting a problem) happen in an app without a queue at the front desk.
It is also right sized. You are not paying for enterprise modules you never touch, and you are not duct taping around a cheap tool that cannot handle flexible stays. The stack fits the business you have and can stretch to the one you are building.
The most common mistake is buying software first and mapping workflows never, then discovering the tool forces an operating model that does not suit coliving. You end up serving the software instead of the software serving you.
Another is choosing tools that do not integrate, so occupancy lives in one system, billing in another, and access in a third, with a person copying between them. That person is expensive, and they make mistakes.
A third is chasing features over fit. A long feature list is not the same as handling short flexible stays, shared spaces, and community well. Generic hotel or residential software often stumbles on exactly the things that make coliving coliving.
Worked example
Imagine an operator with three buildings running occupancy in a spreadsheet, billing in a generic accounting tool, and access via keys and a lockbox. As the portfolio grew past, say, 100 beds, a staff member ended up spending much of the week reconciling who lives where, who has paid, and who has moved out.
The technology engagement in this example maps the move in, billing, and issue workflows, then selects a coliving oriented PMS that connects to smart access and a resident app. Occupancy, billing, and access now share a single source of truth, so a move out automatically updates access and stops billing without anyone touching three systems.
The headline win is not flashy features, it is the reclaimed staff time and the errors that stop happening. The resident app also lets people pay and report issues themselves, which quietly removes a stack of front desk interruptions each week.
Areas of consulting
Coliving consulting by market
See what the advisory engagement includes, how it works, and how to begin.
