Everything Coliving

How to Run Sensitivity Analysis on a Coliving Underwriting Model

Specific approach to sensitivity analysis for coliving deals — which variables matter, what ranges to use, and how to communicate results to investors.

Prerequisites

  • Working coliving underwriting model (5-year P&L + IRR)
  • Excel Data Table function familiarity (or Python with pandas)

TL;DR

Test 3 high-impact variables: exit cap rate (±100bps), stabilized occupancy (±5pp), ADR (±10%). Build a 9-cell IRR matrix per variable pair. Communicate in a tornado chart showing IRR impact range per variable. Stop adding variables beyond the top 5; analysis paralysis hurts decisions.

Step-by-step

  1. 1

    1. Identify the top 5 sensitivity variables

    Always: exit cap rate, stabilized occupancy, ADR, debt cost, lease-up timeline. Sometimes: capex, exit timing, FX (for cross-border deals).

  2. 2

    2. Set realistic ranges

    Exit cap: ±100bps from base. Occupancy: ±5pp. ADR: ±10% (matched to historical volatility). Debt cost: ±200bps. Don't use ±50% on everything — defeats the purpose.

  3. 3

    3. Build 2-variable Data Tables in Excel

    Data → What-If Analysis → Data Table. Two-variable: row input = ADR, column input = occupancy. Output cell = IRR. Repeat for ADR × exit cap rate, etc.

  4. 4

    4. Build a tornado chart

    For each variable: IRR at +1 SD vs IRR at -1 SD vs base. Sort variables by total IRR swing. The variable at the top is the deal's binding sensitivity.

  5. 5

    5. Stress-test downside scenarios

    Combined adverse scenarios. E.g., exit cap +100bps AND occupancy -5pp AND ADR -10%. Often 80% of practical downside risk. If equity IRR stays positive, deal is robust.

  6. 6

    6. Communicate to investors

    Headline: base IRR + downside-case IRR. Tornado chart showing variable importance. 1-page summary; institutional investors specifically want the 9-cell IRR matrix on top 2 variables.

Common issues + fixes

×Including too many variables

Beyond the top 5 sensitivities, marginal information drops fast. Most institutional pitches stop at 3 variables.

×Unrealistic positive scenarios

If your 'upside' case has occupancy 95%+, exit cap 200bps lower, ADR +20%, you're not modelling — you're hoping. Anchor upside to defensible market data.

×Sensitivity tables but no narrative

Always include a 1–2 sentence summary per chart explaining what the sensitivity tells the reader. Numbers without interpretation are noise.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the most important sensitivity to test for coliving?

Almost always exit cap rate. ±50bps swings IRR 150–250bps. Stabilized occupancy second. ADR third. Other variables typically smaller.

Should I show base, upside, and downside scenarios?

Yes. Base case + downside case is non-negotiable. Upside case useful for investor conversations but downside is the credibility test.

How do I communicate sensitivity to non-technical investors?

Tornado chart. Verbal frame: 'IRR is most sensitive to exit cap (±300bps swing) and least sensitive to ADR (±100bps swing). The deal's primary risk is therefore market-cap-rate environment, not operational.'

Cash Flow Projector

Open the tool →

Last reviewed: 2026-05-03. See all how-to guides →

Ready to put this into practice?

We work with operators on licensing, deals, and rollouts across 21 jurisdictions.

Join Our Coliving Community on WhatsApp

Monthly masterminds, weekly updates, and networking with coliving operators worldwide.

Join WhatsApp Community