Everything Coliving

Customer Lifetime Value (CLV / LTV)

Total expected revenue from a customer over their full tenure with the operator, the cap on viable CAC.

LTV is the customer-economics counterpart to CAC. It tells you the total revenue an operator can expect from each tenant over their full tenure. Healthy unit economics require LTV ≥ 3× CAC; below 3× the unit economics are typically unsustainable.

For coliving, LTV is the product of ARPU × ALOS, less the variable cost of serving the tenant. Long-stay corporate-segment LTV often 2x mass-market digital-nomad LTV at the same ARPU because the LOS is longer and CAC is amortized over more months.

A worked LTV example: Lisbon coliving operator at €700 ARPU, 6-month ALOS, variable cost €120/month (cleaning, utilities, marketing trail) = (700-120) × 6 = €3,480 contribution LTV per tenant. CAC at €350 gives LTV/CAC of ~10×, strong. Compare to a Mexico City nomad-focused operator at $720 ARPU, 2.5-month ALOS, $200 variable = $1,300 contribution LTV. CAC at $250 gives LTV/CAC of 5.2×, still healthy but the shorter LOS means any CAC drift hits margins fast. Segment-mix decisions live and die on this calculation; long-stay corporate residents at €1,400/month for 9 months can deliver 4-6× the LTV of shorter-stay nomads at the same ARPU.

Formula

LTV = (ARPU - Variable Cost) × ALOS

Worked example: Tenant ARPU €800/month, variable cost €100/month, ALOS 6 months. LTV = (€800 - €100) × 6 = €4,200. With CAC €500, LTV/CAC = 8.4. Healthy by most standards.

In the field

European coliving LTV/CAC ratios: Outsite ~10–15× (long-stay digital-nomad with low channel cost). Habyt ~6–10×. Stanza Living India ~8–12× (low absolute LTV but very low CAC). Below 3–5× is unsustainable; above 15× usually means under-investment in growth.

Common pitfalls

  • ×Confusing customer LTV with property LTV (loan-to-value), same acronym, completely different metrics.
  • ×Computing LTV at gross revenue rather than net of variable cost, overstates the metric.
  • ×Using churn-implied ALOS rather than observed, churn-implied is faster-converging but can lag operational reality.
  • ×Not segmenting LTV by channel, direct vs. OTA-acquired tenants often have very different LTV profiles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's a good LTV/CAC for coliving?

≥ 3× is the floor for sustainable growth. 5–8× is healthy. Above 10× often indicates the operator could grow faster (over-conservative on acquisition spend). Below 3× indicates either CAC is too high or ALOS is too low.

How does LTV change as the portfolio matures?

Typically increases. Mature portfolios have stronger word-of-mouth, longer ALOS (older brand = more committed tenants), and lower variable cost (operational efficiency). New portfolios in new markets often run sub-3× LTV/CAC for the first 12–24 months.

Should LTV include security deposits?

No. Security deposits are returned to the tenant; they're not revenue. Include them in cash flow modelling but exclude from LTV.

Last reviewed: 2026-05-03. See the full coliving glossary →

Working on the operator side of the metric?

Talk to us about benchmarking, modelling, and operator-grade analytics.

Join Our Coliving Community on WhatsApp

Monthly masterminds, weekly updates, and networking with coliving operators worldwide.

Join WhatsApp Community